Items highlighted in red are unique by state. Check your State Codes to find potential violations from your state.
Reguarding the “Amount” variable: Some policies list a maximum amount of liability per claim, whereas other policies list a large deductible per claim.
State of Virginia
County of [Enter County]
[Name of Board Member]
Name: [Name of School District]
Address: [Your Address]
Phone: [Your Phone]
Date: [The Date Served]
Violation of Your Oath of Office: You have sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution of the State of Arizona and the Constitution of the United States of America. You have failed to uphold both of these constitutions. We live in America and are free to live our lives without restrictions, abuse and unlawful mandates from elected government officials. Mandates are not enforceable laws. As an elected public servant you have no jurisdiction or authority to create or enforce mandates.
Practicing Medicine Without a License – You and everyone employed by this district such as teachers and administrators have engaged in the practice of medicine without a license, which is a violation of state law. You’re recommending medical procedures, vaccination, with a wholly NON FDA approved product, that is licensed under an EUA. Meaning it’s experimental and cannot be advertised at all, per federal law. And you have NON doctors recommending it to children – with NO informed consent. How can you give informed consent when the ingredients in these vaccinations won’t even be released to the public until August 2022?
ORS 677.990: Violation of any provision of this chapter is a misdemeanor. In any prosecution for such violation, it shall be sufficient to sustain a conviction to show a single act of conduct in violation of any of the provisions of this chapter and it shall not be necessary to show a general course of such conduct.
(2)Any person who practices medicine without being licensed under this chapter as prohibited in ORS 677.080 (Prohibited acts) (4) commits a Class C felony.
(3)A person who violates the provisions of ORS 677.360 (Who may select donors and perform procedure) to 677.370 (Eligibility to be donor) commits a Class C misdemeanor.
You have not provided proof that if any staff member or students that wear a mask or take a COVID-19 injection; they will not subsequently contract COVID-19, become ill or die from COVID-19, or transmit COVID-19 to others.
Conditioning continued employment upon participating in a medical experiment and demanding disclosure of private, personal medical information may also create liability under other federal and state laws, including HIPAA, FMLA, and applicable state tort law principles, including torts prohibiting and proscribing invasions of privacy and battery.
Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) 431.180: Interference with individual’s selection of health care provider, treatment or religious practice prohibited –
(1)Nothing in ORS 431.001 (Findings) to 431.550 (Power of Oregon Health Authority to collect information from local public health administrators) and 431.990 (Penalties) or any other public health law of this state shall be construed as authorizing the Oregon Health Authority or its representatives, or any local public health authority or its representatives, to interfere in any manner with an individual’s right to select the physician, physician assistant, naturopathic physician or nurse practitioner of the individual’s choice or the individual’s choice of mode of treatment, nor as interfering with the practice of a person whose religion treats or administers sick or suffering people by purely spiritual means.
Issuing mandate that violate Oregon State Law is against the laws of the state. Furthermore, you are not licensed to give any such medical advice to an personal that restricts his freedom of choice, right to breathe fresh clean air, or freedom to consult a licensed medical doctor to see if the experimental drug you are ordering them to take will harm me in any way and cause me permanent lifelong damages. Your mandates have stripped me of my freedoms and right to choose my own physician that will allow me to ask questions before accepting any non-FDA approved drug as a solution to a illness that has a 98.9% survival rate.
Oregon Compilation of School Discipline Laws and Regulations: ORS 339.288 – Prohibitions on use of certain restraints – (1) The use of the following types of restraint on a student in a public education program is prohibited: (h) Any restraint that impedes, or creates a risk of impeding, breathing.
Demanding and issuing mandates that force a parent to mask their child to attend a free public school for a free educations is against all laws of the state. Restricting children to breathe through a face covering for 8 hours a day is cruel and inhuman practices and should be punished in a court of law. Children are suffering in school, are having difficulties breathing freely without a mask, and have had more fungus, and bacterial infections due to these illegal and unlawful mandates you impose upon us.
This NOTICE is to inform you of your VIOLATION(S) of my CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS (Article 4:2:1) or ANY OTHER RIGHTS, PRIVILEGES, OR IMMUNITIES that I may have and VIOLATION(S) OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW as is required by US Code, Statute, the Constitution for the united States of America and the Oregon Constitution.
BE IT KNOWN that you are attempting to make law in the absence of due process of law by issuing “Ordinances,” “Orders,” “Mandates,” and other statements that create a color of law but are not actual law and you DO NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DO SO. THEREFORE, you are PARTICIPATING IN A CONSPIRACY that is IN VIOLATION OF YOUR OATH OF OFFICE. As an Oath Sworn public servant you are governed by the Contracts established by Federal and Oregon State Constitutions and Federal Codes and Statutes and all apply to you.
You have not thoroughly researched the wearing of a mask or COVID-19 injections in order to determine if they have been fully tested and proven entirely safe for everyone. You cannot prove to us that the wearing of a mask or COVID-19 injection will not catalyze a lifelong neurodegenerative process, disorder, or disease by poisoning and disabling staff or students private property’s brain.
Be on Notice that YOU WILL BE HELD FULLY RESPONSIBLE AND PERSONALLY
LIABLE for your actions under the pertinent US Codes (see attached schedule of fines) and Criminal and Civil Statutes, some of which are set forth in this NOTICE, but are not limited to this notice.
Violation of Presidential Executive Order 13132 of August 4, 1999: By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to guarantee the division of governmental responsibilities between the national government and the States that was intended by the Framers of the Constitution, to ensure that the principles of federalism established by the Framers guide the executive departments and agencies in the formulation and implementation of policies, and to further the policies of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1 Definition. For purposes of this order: (a) ‘‘Policies that have federalism implications’’ refers to regulations, legislative comments or proposed legislation, and other policy statements or actions that have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. (b) ‘‘State’’ or ‘‘States’’ refer to the States of the United States of America, individually or collectively, and, where relevant, to State governments, including units of local government and other political subdivisions established by the States.
Both executive orders and proclamations have the force of law, much like regulations issued by federal agencies, so they are codified under Title 3 of the Code of Federal Regulations, which is the formal collection of all of the rules and regulations issued by the executive branch and other federal agencies. Furthermore, no local agency can make rules to enforce unconstitutionally authorized acts restricting the people. Executive Order 13132 requires all agencies including those of the state to make regulations consistent with the principles that only constitutionally authorized acts be used to restrict the people of the state. Forced vaccine, testing, and mask mandates are not laws that are constitutional and allow a person freedom of choice, travel, earn a living, or the choice to make their own medical decisions.
Abuse of Power: Color of Law or Color of Office: Section 1983 provides redress for constitutional violations committed “under color of” state law.2 In Monroe v. Pape, 3 the Court interpreted this phrase to include deprivations of constitutional rights caused by state officers acting either without authority or, what is much the same, in violation of state law.
In regard to requiring Proof of a Covid-19 Vaccination/Testing/Boosting/Masking for employees of Emergency Medical Services, Fire, Law Enforcement, Temporary Disaster Shelters, Dental Offices, Pharmacies, Students, Employers, Patrons, etc., this constitutes direct and constructive notice to you personally and to all your subordinates, and your or their replacements, successors, substitutes and agents. The purpose of this notice is to make you aware of violations of the law and allow you the due process right to correct them and restrict your actions to the limits placed upon you by the Oregon State Constitution and the Constitution for the united States of America as well as case law including County of Butler v. Governor Wolf, Case 2:20-cv-00677-WSS 1 and Home Building & Loan Assoc. v. Blaisdell , 290 U.S. 398 (1934) 2 and Ex Parte Milligan , 71 U.S. 2 (1866).
There can be no policy or procedure, rule, law or mandate, among others, that violate any unalienable rights, the Constitutions or Bill of Rights. 42 USC 1983- Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights: “Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action of law.”
42 U.S. Code § 1983 – Civil action for deprivation of rights: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
Any and all “COVID-19” “ordinances,” “policies,” “orders,” or “mandates” including those given by a Governor or State Health Officer or Board of Supervisors (Ordinances 4461, 4464) or County Health Officer and including but not limited to orders for mandatory vaccination, testing, tracking, or proof of “vaccination”, boosters and masking are not law and do not contain the force of law as they have not been passed by the State or Federal Legislature and further, no law created by any governing body that would require the People to consent to the violation of their natural, unalienable, Constitutionally protected rights can exist.
42 U.S. Code § 1985 – Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights: If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to induce by like means any officer of the United States to leave any State, district, or place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties.
The “orders” or “mandates” of a governor, board of supervisors or agent or officer of the Centers For Disease Control (CDC) or for a city, county or state health department are not law, and public “policy” cannot be created that would violate the Due Process Rights or Liberty of the People. Therefore, enforcement of such mandates or health orders at any level is a violation of the actual law and you can be held personally liable for that violation.
The information you are basing your polices on are erroneous, hearsay, based upon assumption(s) presumptions(s), lies or propaganda and not scientific facts.
Uniform Commercial Code § 3-307. Notice of breach of fiduciary duty: (1) “Fiduciary” means an agent, trustee, partner, corporate officer or director, or other representative owing a fiduciary duty with respect to an instrument.
(2) “Represented person” means the principal, beneficiary, partnership, corporation, or other person to whom the duty stated in paragraph (1) is owed.
You have failed to provide the staff and students with informed consent regarding all potential, proven and/or unknown risks of these medical interventions, which include but are not limited to dangerously low levels of oxygen in the bloodstream, dangerously high levels of carbon dioxide in the bloodstream, depression, anxiety, suicide, sever anaphylaxis, myocarditis, cardiac arrest, stroke, autism, miscarriage, infertility, birth defects, chronic or acute autoimmune disorders such as blood clots or cytokine storms. Chronic or acute neurological disorders such as Guillain Barre Syndrome or Bell’s Palsy. Severe complications form Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), & death.
You have failed to provide me proof that the mandate you are imposing on me has been passed and signed through Congress as per Article I of the Constitution for the United States of America.
Federal law, Title 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I-III) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: Emergency dispensing – The requirements of subsections (b) and (f) of section 353, section 354, and section 360j(e) of this title shall not apply to an eligible product, and the product shall not be considered an unapproved product (as defined in section 360bbb–3(a)(2)(A) of this title) and shall not be deemed adulterated or misbranded under this chapter because it is dispensed without an individual prescription.
Any product that is not deemed FDA approved cannot be enforced or mandated. Masks, PCR testing and vaccines are under EUA (emergency use authorization) use only and it is illegal for any Federal or State government to mandate such items. Furthermore, you and your school board members do not have the authority to mandate EUA products.
Federal law prohibits any mandate of the mask as unlicensed, emergency-use-authorization-only. Subsection bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) of section 360 of Title 21 of the United States Code, otherwise known as the Emergency Use Authorization section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, demands that everyone give employees the “option to accept or refuse administration” of the Covid-19 vaccine.
Mandating the use of Experimental Use Authorization (EUA) products as a condition of my employment and my private property enrollment and/or without consent is a violation of Title 21, Section 360bbb-3 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act: To enforce the constitutional right to vote, to confer jurisdiction upon the district courts of the United States to provide injunctive relief against discrimination in public accommodations, to authorize the attorney General to institute suits to protect constitutional rights in public facilities and public education, to extend the Commission on Civil Rights, to prevent discrimination in federally assisted programs, to establish a Commission on Equal Employment Opportunity, and for other purposes.
Illegally creating and/or enforcing policies on minors in order to attend school violate their civil right to attend school as citizens of the United States of America. Restricting Oregonian’s freedoms and forcing them to wear a mask that is dangerous and has no concrete scientific backing is in direct violation of their civil rights.
Drafting ordinances that falsely reflect the authority of the CDC or an appointed public servant within state agencies that lack direct accountability to the people violates at minimum Article 1, Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 19 of the Oregon State Constitution as well as the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution for the united States of America. To be clear, the People have waived none of our rights and do not consent to any ordinances that violate any of our natural, unalienable,
Constitutionally protected and secured rights or any other rights that we may have.
Mandating my private property to declare private property’s vaccination status and submit my private property vaccination documents as a condition of enrollment is a violation of my right to be secure in my person, house, papers and effects under the 4th Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America.
COL (Color of Law): Section 242 of Title 18: Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
If even one child is harmed, injured, or dies as a result of mask requirements, PCR testing, or receiving a vaccine as a result of your coercion, you and the entire school board members are liable for all injuries.
YOU ARE ALSO HEREBY WARNED that you will lose any “immunity” and be held
fully responsible and personally liable for any unlawful actions which violate any of our Rights (including any fees or fines for damages which result from any violations pursuant to U.S.C. Title 18, Sections 241-242 and U.S.C. Title 42, Section 1983).
Protection of Children in International Humanitarian Law 30-06-1984 Article: International humanitarian law provides general protection for children as persons taking no part in hostilities, and special protection as persons who are particularly vulnerable. Moreover, children taking part in hostilities are also protected. The various aspects of the legal protection of children as members of the civilian population.
Our children are protected under this international treaty because we are now living in a hostile environment and our children are particularly vulnerable to what is taking place around the world. Enforcing mask policy on young children is in violation of this international treaty. Furthermore, exposing young children to obscene material, CRT, and the LGBTQ+ is dangerous for a child. This Protection of Children in International Humanitarian Law is in place to protect our children against such policy/enforcement and coerced testing or educational materials.
The Hague Conference on Private International Law: The Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) is a global inter-governmental organization that has developed standards for the transnational cooperation on child protection and family matters. The key themes addressed by the Conventions of the Hague Conference include transnational child protection, inter-country adoption, cross-border parental child abduction as well as matters of parental responsibility and contact involving different countries.
The HCCH protects our children and their families against abuse inflicted upon them from a public school system. Our children are to be protected in our home and when attending public schools. Your failure to protect our children is in direct violation of the Private International Law HCCH.
UN Child Protection: By virtue of Security Council resolutions 1539 (2004) and 1612 (2005), which request that action plans and dialogue for their development be established, United Nations child protection advisers and teams are mandated – and have the political space – to engage with all state and non-state armed actors involved in grave violations against children. CPAs foresee and diligently plan opportunities for engaging with parties to the conflict on child protection matters.
Our public school systems have become a hostile environment for our children. The school board has enforced illegal mask policies, allowed offensive material to enter into the school system, and has instructed the teachers to teach critical race theory (CRT) (aka SEL) as part of the educational system. The UN protects our children, and the United States of America has signed a treaty with the UN in order to ensure our children are protected at home and in our public schools.
International Humanitarian Law: Persons who are not, or are no longer, participating in hostilities must be protected; and the right of parties to an armed conflict to choose methods and means of warfare is not unlimited.
Our children are not now, nor have ever been, involved in direct hostilities in order to conquer an illness that has a 99.8% survival rate. Our children are protected under the International Humanitarian Law and must be protected at all costs. Demanding and/or mandating EUA masks and PCR testing in a public school system does not protect our children and their rights to freedom of education and life.
UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration: The first principle advocated in the UDBHR is respect for “human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms” (Article 3). Although this principle had long been established since the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Right s (United Nations 1948), which is today widely regarded as the cornerstone of the international human rights system that emerged after the Second World War, the UDBHR was the first international instrument to comprehensively integrate international human rights law into the field of biomedicine. By broadening the scope of the respect principle from personal autonomy to human dignity, the UDBHR overcomes a shortcoming of previous bioethics documents, which seemed to accord respect only to autonomous persons.
This law and treaty is still in effect today and protects our children’s right to human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms. Masking our children takes away their human rights in society to live freely and express themselves. Furthermore, demanding our children to declare they are transgender is in direct violation of international human rights.
Geneva Declaration of the Rights of the Child: Every child has the right to health, education and protection, and every society has a stake in expanding children’s opportunities in life. Yet, around the world, millions of children are denied a fair chance for no reason other than the country, gender or circumstances into which they are born.
The school board’s mandates are endangering the health of our children. We are no longer able to protect our children when they attend public school. The school system now is based on CRT and offensive material that is brought in by this board and distributed throughout the schools in this district. Your school board is distributing offensive material and pushing the LGBTQ+ agenda in schools. You and your school board members are in direct violation of the Geneva Declaration, which is an international treaty that protects our children’s right to health and an education.
The Nuremberg Code: “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person… No one shall be subjected to … inhuman or degrading treatment … Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights… No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence…”
The Right to Informed Consent is Meaningless Without the Right to Refuse Any Medical Intervention, Including Mandated Vaccination. Government Agents and those Acting Under Color of Law are Forbidden by Long-Standing National and International Law from Coercing Vaccination. Furthermore, this includes mask mandates and PCR testing. Children under the age of eighteen years of age need a parent’s signature on any and all documents that deal with medical testing and this includes PCR testing in school.
This right to refuse experimental medical devices implements the internationally agreed legal requirement of Informed Consent established in the Nuremberg Code of 1947. As the Nuremberg Code established, every person must “be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision” for any medical experimental product, as the masks currently are. The Nuremberg Code prohibited even the military from requiring such experimental vaccines. (Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (D.D.C. 2003).
Demanding employees, students, and parents divulge their personal medical information invades their protected right to privacy and discriminates against them based on their perceived medical status, in contravention of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (42 USC §12112(a).) Requiring me or my private property to wear a face covering as a visible symbol of my vaccination statues reveals my personal medical information and opens me to harassment, discrimination, or censure.
You are in violation of state, federal and international laws. You were not appointed or elected by the public to rule and control over us like a dictator. You were voted in to serve us and protect us. You have failed your duties as an elected and appointed government official when you stepped outside the boundaries of the law of this state and started mandating illegal and immoral mandates that affect the lives of all Oregonians.
You are a part of the Administrative Branch, which is a subset of the Executive Branch created through the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946. The executive branch can only enforce laws, not create them!
Furthermore, you are not medical doctors and/or have no idea the long-term effects that masks, PCR tests and experimental vaccines have on the health of Oregonians. You have single handily decided that you are the new authority of health and wellness of all Oregonians. All injuries to Oregonians are your responsibility and you will be liable for all damages caused by these mandates you wish to enforce.
A BOND CLAIM MAY BE FILED AGAINST YOUR SURETY LIABLITY INSURANCE
POLICY IF THESE MANDATES DO NOT STOP TODAY
Total Amount Owed To Notifying Party: [Amount]
|VIOLATION OF OATH OF OFFICE
|18 USC 3571
|18 USC 241
|DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW
|18 USC 242
|18 USC 872
|18 USC 1001
|18 USC 1964(C)
|BRIBERY CONCERNING RECEIVING FEDERAL FUNDS
violation (10 years
|18 USC 666
|OBSTRUCTING AND DELAYING COMMERCE and unlawfully taking and obtaining personal property under fear of threat
|10 years in prison
|18 USC 1951
|18 USC 1091
|TREASON (combined actions above) and allowing unelectedand $250,000.00 18 USC 3571 Page 7 of 16 unaccountable agencies and agents to dictate and shape policy that violates due process rights
|18 USC 3571
This notice is provided to inform you that the Notifying Party has provided the above descriptions of the unconstitutional and illegal actions that have endangered the lives of all students attending school in this district and the staff members. You all have broken numerous state, federal, and international laws with no regards to the Constitution of the United States, the Bill of Rights, and the Constitution of the State of Oregon. The educational system you have enforced is not a system that will ever teach our children to be well rounded and become the next generation of leaders in this county. CRT and transgender have no place in public education and neither does mandates that are unconstitutional and endanger lives.
If this action does not stop today, the Notifying Party will file a claim against your [Insurance or Bond Company – Policy Number] . You have (72) hours upon receipt of this notice, to correct these violations at all the schools in the Scottsdale County School District. This includes the following:
We have the right as free Americans living under the Constitution of the United States, the Bill of Rights, and the Constitution of the State of Oregon to freely travel without restrictions, seek employment without stipulations, shop freely and live our lives without mandates that violate our God Given Rights as free people of the United States of America. You were elected by the people to serve the people not to control, destroy, enslave and dictate what we should and should not be doing with our lives.
Failure to comply with the aforementioned demands within (7) business days after receiving this notice will result in a claim being filed against the policy for each member of this board or office which will include the superintendents of this district. Furthermore,