Menu
Items highlighted in red are unique by state. Check your State Codes to find potential violations from your state.
Reguarding the “Amount” variable: Some policies list a maximum amount of liability per claim, whereas other policies list a large deductible per claim.
State of Florida
County of [Enter County]
Notice to:
[Name of Board Member]
Name: [Name of School District]
Title: [Title]
Address: [Address]
Notifying Party:
[Your Name]
Address: [Your Address]
Phone: [Your Phone]
Date: [The Date Served]
Violation of Your Oath of Office: You have sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution of the State of Arizona and the Constitution of the United States of America. You have failed to uphold both of these constitutions. We live in America and are free to live our lives without restrictions, abuse and unlawful mandates from elected government officials. Mandates are not enforceable laws. As an elected public servant you have no jurisdiction or authority to create or enforce mandates.
Practicing Medicine Without a License – You and everyone employed by this district such as teachers and administrators have engaged in the practice of medicine without a license, which is a violation of state law. You’re recommending medical procedures, vaccination, with a wholly NON FDA approved product, that is licensed under an EUA. Meaning it’s experimental and cannot be advertised at all, per federal law. And you have NON doctors recommending it to children – with NO informed consent. How can you give informed consent when the ingredients in these vaccinations won’t even be released to the public until August 2022?
Florida Statutes Title XLVI Chapter 784 Section 048: The statute provides that anyone who willfully, maliciously and repeatedly follows, harasses or cyberstalks another commits the offense of stalking. Stalking is a misdemeanor of the first degree that can be punished by imprisonment of up to one year and a fine of up to $1,000.
There are plenty of documented cases at the school and filed with this board that you refuse to acknowledge or even investigate. Each one of these offenses that occur is a fine and or punished by imprisonment for up to one year. As a public elected official it is your duty to know the law and follow the law. In the court system that is why we have the right to personally file against you in Federal Court using an SR95. Tort violations are frowned upon by the Federal court system and especially when it comes to the misconduct and treatment of a minor child.
Felony Stalking in Florida: What behaviors constitute aggravated stalking? They can involve verbal or nonverbal threats, or a combination of the two. Threats delivered by electronic communication or implied by a pattern of conduct can also be considered credible threats if they place the victim in reasonable fear for their safety or the safety of family members when the stalker appears to have the ability to carry out the threat. But Florida law does not require proof that the person making the threat actually intended to carry it out to constitute aggravated stalking.
Aggravated stalking is considered a 3rd degree felony and is punishable by up to 15 years in prison and fines reaching $10,000.
My daughter is no longer safe to attend the public school in this district. Your board refuses to monitor, correct, or investigate the charges I have placed before you. You allow the teachers and principle of the school to stalk and harass my child while attending classes. She is singled out in class, put a room alone with a person who questions her about her conversations at home. This is uncalled for behavior and I fear for her life and I have no confidence in the school system because of these unconstitutional behaviors your board and staff members display here and in our schools.
F.S. 1001.41, 1001.49, 1001.51: 1010 – BOARD – SUPERINTENDENT RELATIONSHIP: Pursuant to State law, the Superintendent is empowered to recommend the adoption of policies determined to be necessary for the efficient operation and general improvement of the District. Suggestions for new policies or for revisions to existing policies may be made by the Board, the staff, or community member. After considering recommendations submitted by the Superintendent, the Board is empowered to determine policies for the District. The Superintendent has the duty, pursuant to State law, to enforce the policies established by the Board, and, therefore, the Superintendent shall be given latitude to determine the best method of implementing the policies of the Board.
The Superintendent of this district allows these school administrators to violate our children’s right to have their parents present when questioned by an adult. The law is the same as if a police officer was to question my child without my permission or presence. What gives you the authority to violate my rights as a parent and question my daughter in a closed room without notifying me first? I have notified this school, the board and the superintendent on several occasions that my daughter will not be questioned by any member of the staff at the school she attends. You ignore my rights and if you do decide to call me to inform me, when I arrive my daughter is taken out of the room and you refuse to talk with us in the same room.
F.S. 1001.41(2), 1006.145: 1001.41: General powers of district school board.—The district school board, after considering recommendations submitted by the district school superintendent, shall exercise the following general powers:
(1) Determine policies and programs consistent with state law and rule deemed necessary by it for the efficient operation and general improvement of the district school system.
(2) Adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 to implement the provisions of law conferring duties upon it to supplement those prescribed by the State Board of Education and the Commissioner of Education.
You ignore your own laws and refuse to enforce law that should be enforced when questioning a minor without their parent present. It appears that your school can summons my daughter any time they feel it is necessary disrupting her education and keeping her locked in a room for hours at a time. She is denied her civil right to leave this room and return to class.
1139 – EDUCATOR MISCONDUCT: It is the responsibility of all employees of the Board to promptly report to the office of the Superintendent or the office of Employee Relations any complaint against an administrator that comes to the employee’s attention that includes grounds for the revocation or suspension of a teaching certificate. The willful failure by an employee of the Board to promptly report a complaint shall constitute cause for discipline of the employee as provided by law and Board policy.
A full investigation needs to be conducted of this school, teachers need to be questioned, brought up on charges or suspended for the behavior they display in this school district. No teacher that displays this type of behavior should be allowed to maintain their teaching certificate or allowed to continue to teach in any public school around the country.
1210 – STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT
Definitions
For purposes of this policy, the term “administrator” means those individuals identified in F.S. 1012.01(3). Administrative personnel typically perform management activities such as developing broad policies for the District and executing those policies through the direction of personnel at all levels within the District. Administrative personnel are generally high-level, responsible personnel who have been assigned the responsibilities of systemwide or schoolwide functions, including the following: the superintendent;
District-based instructional administrators; District-based noninstructional administrators; school administrators; and others who perform management activities
It is your responsibility along with the Superintendent of the school to monitor the programs and activities of each school in this district. You refuse to look at the issues that have been brought before this board. The Superintendent allows and encourages these activities to continue in our public school system. Allowing sexual surveys to be given to our children is a disgrace and they are minors. It is up to the parents to decide if this is appropriate or not for our children to take. Furthermore, why does the school support so many teachers passing out these surveys?
1362 – ANTI-HARASSMENT: General Policy Statement
It is the policy of the Board to maintain an educational and work environment that is free from all forms of unlawful harassment, including sexual harassment. This commitment applies to all District operations, programs, and activities. All students, administrators, teachers, staff, and all other school personnel share responsibility for avoiding, discouraging, and reporting any form of unlawful harassment. This policy applies to unlawful conduct occurring on school property, or at another location if such conduct occurs during an activity sponsored by the Board.
Your school support surveys in class about sexual activities and questions that are inappropriate for a child to answer in school. Furthermore, if you are forcing children to take these types of surveys in school it is up to the parent’s deaccession to approve or disapprove of these types of surveys. I have never signed a consent form for my daughter to participate in these surveys. In a single day she will be asked to take three different surveys in her classes.
5517 – ANTI-HARASSMENT: General Policy Statement
It is the policy of the Board to maintain an educational and work environment that is free from all forms of unlawful harassment, including sexual harassment. This commitment applies to all District operations, programs, and activities. All students, administrators, teachers, staff, and all other school personnel share responsibility for avoiding, discouraging, and reporting any form of unlawful harassment. This policy applies to unlawful conduct occurring on school property, or at another location if such conduct occurs during an activity sponsored by the Board.
There are many teachers in the school that my daughter attends that keeps asking her to keep secrets from her parents which is in direct violations of state laws. If there are illegal activities or questionable activities that my child wants to discuss with me it is none of your business or the teachers business what I talk with my child about. Furthermore, if my daughter is upset at the activities at this school she has a right to tell me about what is happening. You do not have a right to know anything about our home life or what we discuss in the privacy of our home.
Anti-Harassment Policy: Retaliating against a person who has made a report or filed a complaint alleging unlawful harassment, or who has participated as a witness in a harassment investigation.
Each time a report has been filed at the school my daughter attends she has been retaliated against by the principle and teachers of this school. The principle refuses to investigate any of the reports but instead will side with the teachers and allow the teacher to harass my child and single her out in class.
Anti-Harassment Policy: Disregarding, failing to investigate adequately, or delaying the investigation of allegations of unlawful harassment, when responsibility for reporting and/or investigating unlawful harassment charges comprises part of one’s supervisory duties.
According to the laws of the state of Florida and the United States this is a felony and needs to be investigated. Harassing a young child on a daily basis is a crime and no professional who is in authority has the right to torment and harass a child who attends public school in this district.
Bullying: Bullying rises to the level of unlawful harassment when one or more persons systematically and chronically inflict physical hurt or psychological distress on one (1) or more students or employees and that bullying is based upon sex, race (including anti-Semitism), color, national origin, religion, or disability, that is, characteristics that are protected by Federal civil rights laws. It is defined as any unwanted and repeated written, verbal, or physical behavior, including any threatening, insulting, or dehumanizing gesture, by an adult or student, that is severe or pervasive enough to create an intimidating, hostile, or offensive educational environment; cause discomfort or humiliation; or unreasonably interfere with the individual’s school performance or participation; and may involve: Threats & intimidation
My daughter was issued a referral out of class and sent to Mr. Copeland’s office where they refused to allow her to leave. The teacher issued her a referral and told her that she needed to disclose the conversation she had with her parents that she refused to talk about. When I was finally notified of this situation I had to inform the school I would involve the police if they didn’t release my daughter immediately. Her school teachers continue to bully and harass my daughter.
Sexual, religious, or racial harassment; in three different classes my daughter attends they were forced to take a Sex ID survey. The classroom handout worksheet in CRJ class that promoting religious groups as hate groups. Around the school are GLSEN stickers everywhere along with Pasco School safe place stickers that exclude religion. Furthermore the CRJ class the teachers are teaching the children about racial profiling, propaganda, and telling my daughter that her father is a racist because he works in law enforcement.
Public humiliation: The girl’s bathroom is no longer safe when you want into the bathroom and witness sexual activities. After having to fill out the 3 different Sex ID surveys my daughter was called out of two classes to be left alone in the room with a discipline assistant that wanted to talk with my daughter about private issues and conversations we have in our home. The discipline assistant wants to know what I talked with her about female issues. Another teacher seems to love to issue referrals to my daughter and have her pulled out of class because she refuses to tell them what we speak of at home.
The school bathroom display sexual activities, material, and are now unisex which is against the law and not permitted in public school. The young children who enter into this restroom are in danger of being attacked or even rapped by the boys who now are allowed to use girl’s restrooms at this school.
Harmful-to-minors laws SB 17: prevents elementary and secondary schools and non- college/university libraries from raising a defense to the law-making at a felony to expose minors to “harmful” material. It also strips away protections for material that is disseminated for educational purposes. It lets parents sue to enforce this criminal statute, and would also allow parents to use it if they object to any part of the school curriculum or material available in a school library.
Sexual material is displayed throughout the school in the libraries, classroom and even the bathroom at school. This material that is taught in school, asked on surveys and displayed in bathroom is not appropriate for children under the age of 18. This endangers and arouses children at your school and when you walk into the girl’s restroom you can witness sexual activities between the students. The school environment is no longer a safe place for any of us to send our children.
20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.: No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, except that.
You have allowed inappropriate material into our school system and encouraged teachers to use this material, conduct sex surveys and display this in children’s bathrooms. My daughter refuses to accept this in school and stands up to this by refusing to talk about private conversations she has with her parents. Therefore, she is harassed and removed from class and sent to the office where she is locked in a room and not allowed to leave.
18 U.S.C. § 1470- Transfer of obscene material to minors: The U.S. Supreme Court established the test that judges and juries use to determine whether matter is obscene in three major cases: Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 24-25 (1973); Smith v. United States, 431 U.S. 291, 300-02, 309 (1977); and Pope v. Illinois, 481 U.S. 497, 500-01 (1987). The three-pronged Miller test is as follows:
Whether the average person, applying contemporary adult community standards, finds that the matter, taken as a whole, appeals to prurient interests (i.e., an erotic, lascivious, abnormal, unhealthy, degrading, shameful, or morbid interest in nudity, sex, or excretion)
Even the Supreme Court has established a law that prohibits this type of material into our public schools if we find it offensive and trying to sexual arouse our children. If this is the type of material that is taught in public school each and every teacher that pushes this type of material should be removed from the public school. This includes yourself for allowing this to be brought into our school and displayed before our children.
Harmful-to-minors laws SB 17: prevents elementary and secondary schools and non- college/university libraries from raising a defense to the law-making at a felony to expose minors to “harmful” material. It also strips away protections for material that is disseminated for educational purposes. It lets parents sue to enforce this criminal statute, and would also allow parents to use it if they object to any part of the school curriculum or material available in a school library.
The books you have purchased and display in your schools library is harmful to minors and disseminated for educational purposes. Furthermore, the material you teach in the classroom conserving critical race theory (CRT) and LGBTQ+ have no place in public schools. Furthermore, holding gay rights parades and demanding children to declare there are transgender to participate is against the first amendment of the Constitution of the United States which you swore an oath of office to uphold and protect.
18 U.S. Code § 1470 – Transfer of obscene material to minors: Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly transfers obscene matter to another individual who has not attained the age of 16 years, knowing that such other individual has not attained the age of 16 years, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.
By willfully and knowingly purchasing material for children that is harmful, offensive, sexual orientated, and disgraceful to display in the library for children under the age of 18. Each member of this school board and the district teachers, and librarians have knowingly transferred this material to children under the age of 16. You deem this material appropriate for young children to read obscene material in our public schools.
42 U.S. Code § 1983 – Civil action for deprivation of rights: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
Our children have a right to live without requirements or mandates that restrict their ability to breathe freely. Forcing mandates on children has caused behavioral problems, learning disabilities and damaged social skills.
42 U.S. Code § 1985 – Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights: If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to induce by like means any officer of the United States to leave any State, district, or place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties.
You, along with your school board, have voted to uphold unlawful mandates that have interfered with the civil rights and abilities of the teachers and the principals, thereby preventing them from performing their duties. You have placed restrictions on the schools and principals that force them to follow these mandates/requirements or be relieved of their duties. Teachers of the district have been coerced into accepting an experimental vaccine that is not FDA approved in order to continue their employment.
3-307. Notice of breach of fiduciary duty: (1) “Fiduciary” means an agent, trustee, partner, corporate officer or director, or other representative owing a fiduciary duty with respect to an instrument.
(2) “Represented person” means the principal, beneficiary, partnership, corporation, or other person to whom the duty stated in paragraph (1) is owed.
The School Board and school Superintendent has a fiduciary duty to all the staff, children, and parents of this school district. As an elected public servant, you have breached the duty to serve this community and uphold the constitution of the United States. Illegally mandating EUA (emergency use authorization) products from the FDA has violated the trust of your constituents in this district. You were elected by the people to serve the people in a lawful manner outlined in the Constitutions of the State of Virginia and the United States of America.
20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.: No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, except that.
You have allowed inappropriate material into our school system and encouraged teachers to use this material, conduct sex surveys and display this in children’s bathrooms. My daughter refuses to accept this in school and stands up to this by refusing to talk about private conversations she has with her parents. Therefore, she is harassed and removed from class and sent to the office where she is locked in a room and not allowed to leave.
Federal law, Title 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I-III) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: Emergency dispensing – The requirements of subsections (b) and (f) of section 353, section 354, and section 360j(e) of this title shall not apply to an eligible product, and the product shall not be considered an unapproved product (as defined in section 360bbb–3(a)(2)(A) of this title) and shall not be deemed adulterated or misbranded under this chapter because it is dispensed without an individual prescription.
Any product that is not deemed FDA approved cannot be enforced or mandated. Masks, PCR testing and vaccines are under EUA (emergency use authorization) use only and it is illegal for any Federal or State government to mandate such items. Furthermore, you and your school board members do not have the authority to mandate EUA products.
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act: To enforce the constitutional right to vote, to confer jurisdiction upon the district courts of the United States to provide injunctive relief against discrimination in public accommodations, to authorize the attorney General to institute suits to protect constitutional rights in public facilities and public education, to extend the Commission on Civil Rights, to prevent discrimination in federally assisted programs, to establish a Commission on Equal Employment Opportunity, and for other purposes.
Illegally creating and/or enforcing policies on minors in order to attend school violates their civil right to attend school as citizens of the United States of America. Restricting children’s freedoms and forcing them to wear a mask that is dangerous and has no concrete scientific backing is in direct violation of their civil rights.
The Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA): Every child is entitled to a free and appropriate public education (FAPE).When a school professional believes that a student between the ages of 3 and 21 may have a disability that has substantial impact on the student’s learning or behavior, the student is entitled to an evaluation in all areas related to the suspected disability. Creation of an Individualized Education Plan (IEP)
Many children that attend classes within this School District have disabilities. It is against the law to enforce the use of masks on these children. Many children with disabilities cannot safely wear a mask. The toolkit states individuals who cannot safely wear a mask are exempt; however you, and your school board, have not adhered to this. Conversely, you have demanded that all children attending school wear a mask.
COL (Color of Law): Section 242 of Title 18: Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
If even one child is harmed, injured, or dies as a result of mask requirements, PCR testing, or receiving a vaccine as a result of your coercion, you and the entire school board members are liable for all injuries.
Protection of Children in International Humanitarian Law 30-06-1984 Article: International humanitarian law provides general protection for children as persons taking no part in hostilities, and special protection as persons who are particularly vulnerable. Moreover, children taking part in hostilities are also protected. The various aspects of the legal protection of children as members of the civilian population.
Our children are protected under this international treaty because we are now living in a hostile environment and our children are particularly vulnerable to what is taking place around the world. Enforcing mask policy on young children is in violation of this international treaty. Furthermore, exposing young children to obscene material, CRT, and the LGBTQ+ is dangerous for a child. This Protection of Children in International Humanitarian Law is in place to protect our children against such policy/enforcement and coerced testing or educational materials.
The Hague Conference on Private International Law: The Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) is a global inter-governmental organization that has developed standards for the transnational cooperation on child protection and family matters. The key themes addressed by the Conventions of the Hague Conference include transnational child protection, inter-country adoption, cross-border parental child abduction as well as matters of parental responsibility and contact involving different countries.
The HCCH protects our children and their families against abuse inflicted upon them from a public school system. Our children are to be protected in our home and when attending public schools. Your failure to protect our children is in direct violation of the Private International Law HCCH.
UN Child Protection: By virtue of Security Council resolutions 1539 (2004) and 1612 (2005), which request that action plans and dialogue for their development be established, United Nations child protection advisers and teams are mandated – and have the political space – to engage with all state and non-state armed actors involved in grave violations against children. CPAs foresee and diligently plan opportunities for engaging with parties to the conflict on child protection matters.
Our public school systems have become a hostile environment for our children. The school board has enforced illegal mask policies, allowed offensive material to enter into the school system, and has instructed the teachers to teach critical race theory (CRT) (aka SEL) as part of the educational system. The UN protects our children, and the United States of America has signed a treaty with the UN in order to ensure our children are protected at home and in our public schools.
International Humanitarian Law: Persons who are not, or are no longer, participating in hostilities must be protected; and the right of parties to an armed conflict to choose methods and means of warfare is not unlimited.
Our children are not now, nor have ever been, involved in direct hostilities in order to conquer an illness that has a 99.8% survival rate. Our children are protected under the International Humanitarian Law and must be protected at all costs. Demanding and/or mandating EUA masks and PCR testing in a public school system does not protect our children and their rights to freedom of education and life.
UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration: The first principle advocated in the UDBHR is respect for “human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms” (Article 3). Although this principle had long been established since the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Right s (United Nations 1948), which is today widely regarded as the cornerstone of the international human rights system that emerged after the Second World War, the UDBHR was the first international instrument to comprehensively integrate international human rights law into the field of biomedicine. By broadening the scope of the respect principle from personal autonomy to human dignity, the UDBHR overcomes a shortcoming of previous bioethics documents, which seemed to accord respect only to autonomous persons.
This law and treaty is still in effect today and protects our children’s right to human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms. Masking our children takes away their human rights in society to live freely and express themselves. Furthermore, demanding our children to declare they are transgender is in direct violation of international human rights.
Geneva Declaration of the Rights of the Child: Every child has the right to health, education and protection, and every society has a stake in expanding children’s opportunities in life. Yet, around the world, millions of children are denied a fair chance for no reason other than the country, gender or circumstances into which they are born.
The school board’s mandates are endangering the health of our children. We are no longer able to protect our children when they attend public school. The school system now is based on CRT and offensive material that is brought in by this board and distributed throughout the schools in this district. Your school board is distributing offensive material and pushing the LGBTQ+ agenda in schools. You and your school board members are in direct violation of the Geneva Declaration, which is an international treaty that protects our children’s right to health and an education.
The Nuremberg Code: “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person… No one shall be subjected to … inhuman or degrading treatment … Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights… No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence…”
The Right to Informed Consent is Meaningless Without the Right to Refuse Any Medical Intervention, Including Mandated Vaccination. Government Agents and those Acting Under Color of Law are Forbidden by Long-Standing National and International Law from Coercing Vaccination. Furthermore, this includes mask mandates and PCR testing. Children under the age of eighteen years of age need a parent’s signature on any and all documents that deal with medical testing and this includes PCR testing in school.
The schools, teachers, instructors, Superintendent and this school board are a complete disgrace to all parents of this district. Unlawful detainment, sexual ID tests, harassing children, preaching racism, and calling children’s parents a racist because of the job they perform. Teaching GLSEN agenda in the classroom, displaying sexual propaganda in bathroom and around schools is only causing the children to suffer from an education that is rightfully theirs and has always been. Harassing students and pulling them out of class is a violation of your civil duties as an instructor in our public school system. Sending children to a room to be drilled for extended periods of time because of the answers they supplied to you on an illegal SEX ID survey that they are forced to complete.
*********************
A BOND CLAIM MAY BE FILED AGAINST YOUR SURETY LIABLITY INSURANCE
POLICY IF THESE MANDATES DO NOT STOP TODAY
*********************
Total Amount Owed To Notifying Party: [Amount]
This notice is provided to inform you that the Notifying Party has provided the above descriptions of the unconstitutional and illegal actions that have endangered the health of my children attending this school district. Furthermore, the CRT and LGBTQ+ is inappropriate material to be taught in any school. It incites violence and causes extremely suicide tendencies in your children. If these illegal mandates do not stop today, I will seek damages for the full amount listed above.
If this action does not stop today, the Notifying Party will file a claim against your [Insurance or Bond Company – Policy Number] . You have (72) hours upon receipt of this notice, to correct these violations at all the schools in the Scottsdale County School District. This includes the following:
Parents have a right to vote on the educational material that is being taught in SUSD. Additionally, we have a right to peruse, examine and approve or disapprove of all material that the school board would like to introduce into the schools. You were elected to serve the public and represent parents’ wants for their children.
Failure to comply with these demands will result in added charges brought against you in Federal court under COL. This notice is to inform you of additional charges you could be facing if these offenses are not corrected immediately and stopped at all schools in this district. Furthermore, if a claim is filed against your public official bond, the bond company puts a hold on your bond. According to law you must be bonded to hold your position as a public official. If your bond is on hold or cancelled you can no longer serve as a public official in this state.
Additional charges you could be liable to pay:
| Breach | Penalty | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| VIOLATION OF OATH OF OFFICE | $250,000.00 | 18 USC 3571 |
| CONSPIRACY | $10,000.00 | 18 USC 241 |
| DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW | $1,000.00 | 18 USC 242 |
| EXTORTION | $5,000.00 | 18 USC 872 |
| FRAUD | $10,000.00 | 18 USC 1001 |
| RICO/RACKETEERING (CIVIL) | 25,000.00 | 18 USC 1964(C) |
| BRIBERY CONCERNING RECEIVING FEDERAL FUNDS | $5,000 per violation (10 years in prison) | 18 USC 666 |
| OBSTRUCTING AND DELAYING COMMERCE and unlawfully taking and obtaining personal property under fear of threat | 10 years in prison minimum | 18 USC 1951 “Hobbs Act” |
| GENOCIDE | $1,000,000.00 | 18 USC 1091 |
| TREASON (combined actions above) and allowing unelectedand $250,000.00 18 USC 3571 Page 7 of 16 unaccountable agencies and agents to dictate and shape policy that violates due process rights | $250,000.00 | 18 USC 3571 |
Signature,